By Thomas Matyók , Jessica Senehi, Sean Byrne, Ousmane Bakary Bâ, Thomas Boudreau, Jason J. Campbell, Paul Cormier, Nathan C. Funk, Johan Galtung, Nancy Hansen, Sherrill Hayes, Myrtle Hill, Peter Karari, Neil H. Katz Syracuse University, Peter Kellett, Alka
Peace and clash stories (PCS) comprises students and practitioners in the course of the global operating in peace stories, clash research and backbone, clash administration, applicable dispute answer, and peace and justice experiences. they arrive to the desktops box with a range of principles, techniques, disciplinary roots, and subject parts, which speaks to the complexity, breadth, and intensity had to follow and take account of clash dynamics and the objective of peace. but, a couple of key issues and dilemmas proceed to problem the sector. Critical concerns in Peace and clash experiences: conception, perform, and Pedagogy, edited through Thomas Matyók, Jessica Senehi, and Sean Byrne, is a set of essays that explores a couple of those concerns, supplying a way during which lecturers, scholars, and practitioners can strengthen a variety of how to confront the complexity of up to date conflicts.
Critical concerns in Peace and clash Studies discusses the rising box of desktops, and indicates a framework for the long run improvement of the sphere and the schooling of its practitioners and lecturers. The publication has a large viewers focusing on scholars on the undergraduate, graduate, and post-graduate degrees. It additionally extends to these operating in and prime neighborhood clash answer efforts in addition to humanitarian relief employees
Read or Download Critical Issues in Peace and Conflict Studies: Theory, Practice, and Pedagogy PDF
Best war & peace books
During this ebook, Andrzej Sitkowski confronts easy peacekeeping myths. First, the assumption that peacekeeping is break free peace enforcement blurs this distinction and undermines the viability of peacekeeping operations. Secondly, it's commonly believed that the peacekeepers are allowed to use strength simply in self-defense and absence the authorization to take advantage of it in protecting UN safeguard Councils mandates.
Does women's participation in nation-building make a distinction to the post-conflict trajectories of very unstable societies? ladies and Nation-Building provides compelling findings for policymakers, practitioners, and students fascinated with either the tutorial and pragmatic implementation of an engendered method of nation-building.
- Ireland’s Violent Frontier: The Border and Anglo-Irish Relations During the Troubles
- Fear, Weakness and Power in the Post-Soviet South Caucasus: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis
- Conflict and Peacebuilding in Sri Lanka: Caught in the Peace Trap?
- Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations
Extra info for Critical Issues in Peace and Conflict Studies: Theory, Practice, and Pedagogy
There are the traumas of the past, and the method is conciliation. There are traumatic days, months, years, decades, centuries. These are festering wounds deep down in the social bodies, to be cleaned up through acknowledgment, preparing the ground for a cooperative future. There are the conflicts of the present, and the method is mediation, for conflict resolution. These conflicts are Gordian knots that are not to be cut by brutal violence, but to be unraveled. There are the challenges of the future, and the method is peacebuilding, cooperative, symbiotic-equitable projects producing harmony.
This approach also applies to a Mullah Omar and a Hektamayar, representing the religious and the national resistance, on top of which comes the resistance from the overwhelming majority of Afghans, who simply want neither invasion nor occupation. The conditionality approach, first NATO out, then talks, is highly understandable, but that point can be much better communicated in a dialogue covering all issues. POINT 2: NEVER FEAR CONFLICT: MORE OPPORTUNITY THAN DANGER For Gandhi, conflict was a challenge to know each other, to have something in common and not be irrelevant to each other.
The United States could learn to struggle energetically to lift the bottom 50 percent of society, where basic needs are concerned; to decrease the gap between rich and poor; to restore the dignity of the First Nations, the Inuits, and the Hawaiians; to end discrimination; and to reduce the alienation and fear underlying the violence and drug abuse in society. Israel could learn to lift Arab Israelis into first-class citizenship, to reduce the increasing gap between rich and poor and between Ashkenazim and Sephardim and other groups, and to reduce the corruption and normless hedonism tearing at the society.