By N. Briscoe
Britain used to be arguably the only maximum catalyst and beneficiary of UN peacekeeping operations through the post-war interval. This publication analyses the explanations for this, together with the post-colonial conflicts which Britain passed the UN and its decision to make sure that peacekeeping developed in a way appropriate with united kingdom nationwide pursuits. regardless of preliminary ambivalence approximately letting the UN run army operations, Britain again and again used the association, to shed colonial tasks, keep face, percentage policing burdens, and stabilise conflicts in delicate areas. This finished survey first examines united kingdom event with antecedents of UN operations, significantly nineteenth century colonial policing and missions organize less than the League of countries. It then analyses British efforts to persuade, comprise and make the most person UN operations, together with the Emergency strength demonstrated following the Suez challenge (1956-67), the strength within the Congo (1960-64), and the long-lasting operation in Cyprus (1967-). additionally coated are numerous circumstances while British Governments most well-liked to interfere unilaterally, together with in Jordan and Kuwait. one of many major contributions of the booklet is the special research of inner united kingdom govt and UN documents, which the writer makes use of to reconstruct the coverage making approach. The e-book additionally sheds mild at the peacekeeping rules of definite different key states, relatively the USA and USSR. ultimately, the account addresses a few problems with modern relevance, together with the strain among neutrality and impartiality, peacekeeping in a semi-permissive setting, and using strength.
Read Online or Download Britain and UN Peacekeeping 1948–67 PDF
Similar war & peace books
During this e-book, Andrzej Sitkowski confronts easy peacekeeping myths. First, the assumption that peacekeeping is break away peace enforcement blurs this distinction and undermines the viability of peacekeeping operations. Secondly, it's largely believed that the peacekeepers are allowed to use strength in simple terms in self-defense and absence the authorization to take advantage of it in protecting UN protection Councils mandates.
Does women's participation in nation-building make a distinction to the post-conflict trajectories of very risky societies? ladies and Nation-Building offers compelling findings for policymakers, practitioners, and students enthusiastic about either the educational and pragmatic implementation of an engendered method of nation-building.
- Beyond Terror and Martyrdom: The Future of the Middle East
- War in International Society
- Saudi Arabia and Iran: Friends or Foes?
Extra resources for Britain and UN Peacekeeping 1948–67
The administering power was required simply to transmit ‘regularly to the SecretaryGeneral for information purposes, subject to such limitation as security and constitutional considerations may require, statistical and other information of a technical nature …’30 This was hardly a gross imposition and suited Britain well for several years, until pressure began to build for administering powers to be more accountable. With the broad framework of the new Organization already established at Dumbarton Oaks, much of the work of the San Francisco Conference, from April–June 1945, focused on fine-tuning and gaining the support of the lesser powers.
The Soviet bloc opposed the idea, arguing that the only means by which the United Nations should be provided with forces lay in the conclusion of Article 43 agreements. The British also had mixed feelings about Lie’s proposals. They had consulted the Americans and they both agreed that ‘semi-military’ functions should be excluded. The United States had proposed simply boosting the 66 guards at UN Headquarters to 300 and not keeping a reserve. The British Chiefs of Staff had raised a theme which was often to appear in British discussions on the subject at the time, namely the concern about the risk of communist influence in the Guard Force since its members would be recruited as individuals.
It constituted a pledge to 20 Britain and UN Peacekeeping, 1948–67 respect the rights of inhabitants of such territories, including to develop selfgovernment. 29 By taking the initiative in this way, Britain was able to circumscribe the limits of the UN’s involvement in non-self-governing territories. The administering power was required simply to transmit ‘regularly to the SecretaryGeneral for information purposes, subject to such limitation as security and constitutional considerations may require, statistical and other information of a technical nature …’30 This was hardly a gross imposition and suited Britain well for several years, until pressure began to build for administering powers to be more accountable.