By Tom Regan
What offers an animal 'rights?' What makes product checking out on animals flawed? In Animal Rights, Human Wrongs popular activist and thinker Tom Regan skillfully places forth the argument for animal rights throughout the exploration of 2 questions valuable to ethical idea: What makes an act correct? What makes an act flawed? taking into account ethical theories akin to contractarianism, utilitarianism, and Kantian ethics, Regan offers the theoretical framework that grounds a accountable pro-animal rights standpoint, and finally explores how asking ethical questions on different animals may end up in a greater figuring out of ourselves. the need of creating a transition from ethical conception to ethical perform turns into startlingly transparent as Reagan examines the regular, daily offerings that might be stricken by believing in an ethical thought that affirms the rights of animals. For the numerous those who have ever questioned 'what distinction does it make if animals have rights,' Animal Rights, people Wrongs presents a provocative and interesting resolution. For a dialogue of animal rights adapted to a extra common viewers, see Empty Cages: dealing with the problem of Animal Rights (Rowman & Littlefield, 2003).
Read or Download Animal Rights, Human Wrongs: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy PDF
Similar ethics books
A few argue that atheism has to be fake, on account that with out God, no values are attainable, and therefore "everything is allowed. " Walter Sinnott-Armstrong argues that God is not just no longer necessary to morality, yet that our ethical habit can be totally self sustaining of faith. He assaults a number of middle rules: that atheists are inherently immoral humans; that any society will sink into chaos whether it is turns into too secular; that with no morality, we don't have any cause to be ethical; that absolute ethical criteria require the lifestyles of God; and that with no faith, we easily couldn't be aware of what's wrong and what's correct.
A great new translation and remark. it's going to serve rookies as an informative, available creation to the Nicomachean Ethics and to many concerns in Aristotle’s philosophy, but in addition has a lot to supply complex students. The remark is noteworthy for its common citations of appropriate passages from different works in Aristotle’s corpus, which regularly shed new mild at the texts.
This ebook covers key discussions related to significant US and ecu multinational businesses (MNCs) that resource items from providers in constructing nations. end result of the move of creation from built to constructing countries, there's an pressing have to determine social compliance as a brand new kind of company Social accountability (CSR) and a way in which MNCs can meet anticipated social criteria.
- Sharing Profits: The Ethics of Remuneration, Tax and Shareholder Returns
- Studies in Pascal’s Ethics
- The Ethics of Deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas (3rd Edition)
Additional resources for Animal Rights, Human Wrongs: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy
Because your dog’s interest in avoiding pain, assuming she has this interest, is of no direct moral relevance, your neighbor’s hurting her is not directly morally relevant, either. That being so, the idea of your neighbor’s having a duty directly to your dog and, in general, the idea of any human being having a duty directly to any animal being, emerge as morally empty Why would anyone think that animal interests have no direct relevance to morality? If your dog suffers because your neighbor has broken her leg, how could any rational person deny that her pain is directly morally relevant?
Here is an example that helps illustrate the difference. I happen to want a fancy sports car, which I cannot afford. Bill Gates (as everyone knows) has more money than he knows what to do with. 2-litre six-cylinder sports coupe with a direct shift gearbox. I can’t afford the asking price. I know you can. So I would appreciate 27 CHAPTER 3 it if you would send me a money order (by Express Mail, if you cover the cost. don’t mind) to Your new friend, Tom One thing is abundantly clear. Receiving a car from him-any car-is not something to which I am entitled, not something I am owed or due.
More generally, no one has this right. Other philosophers (those with socialist inclinations) believe in rights of both kinds; for them, some moral rights are negative, but some are positive too. Thus, because receiving health care is such an important good, these philosophers can be counted upon to argue that the children in the second example do have a right to receive it. More generally, everyone has this right. As should be evident, these two ways of thinking about moral rights cannot both be true.